Toribash
Original Post
[TDC] Toribash Debate Club
Toribash Debate Club


__________________________________________________ _______________________

Purpose
In a word, 'edification'. To promote a shared, deeper understanding of the world through discussions on current events, geopolitics and historical context.
__________________________________________________ _______________________

"How is this any different from discussion?"
In Discussion, anyone can post any topic and then everyone does their best to offer their personal opinion on the topic. Half the time, you have people ripping each other into shreds, and for the other half you have people talking about their personal circumstances and not advancing the discussion. [TDC] will do things differently. Topics are exclusive to current events and we'll be focusing on 'why' these events happened. "Why is the world today as it is/how the world works?" is the guiding question. Since everyone in this org is trusted to make decent posts and points, topics wouldn't be closed as prematurely as they might've been in Discussion. We're talking about current events, so we'll let the discussions about them run their natural lifetime.
tl;dr, [TDC] is more specific and less vicious.
__________________________________________________ _______________________

Members
Ele (leader)
ynvaser (leader)
Protonitron (mod)
hawkesnightmare (mod)
d3noth
Galaxy
Ocean
Trick
FMA05
William
BuZe
Hattersin
FleshMon
Havu
AlphanowGD
Squigling
OmegaALT
WeooWeoo
kushman666
qukslice
__________________________________________________ _______________________

Applications
If you want to join then just tell us that you want to join and we’ll add you to the list. We’re operating on trust and good faith, so if you end up posting shit then we’ll just remove you from the list as fast as we added you to it.
__________________________________________________ _______________________

Posting Rules
General forum rules apply. However, at the start of each post you make, you must reference the hashtag of one of topics being discussed. A list of topics is constantly updated in the section below.
__________________________________________________ _______________________

Current Topics
Until we get our board, we've realised that this thread could get very messy (what with multiple discussions occurring simultaneously) without a bit a of structure to each post. So, #nameoftopic should be at the start of your posts. If you want to respond to multiple topics, include both hashtags and separate them with a comma. The following list of topics will be constantly updated to keep in accordance with the current world issues.

#Ukraine - This topic covers Western/US-Russia relations since the breakup of the union and incessant tensions over Ukraine. Subtopics could include NATOs expansions, Russia's xenophobia, red lines, the history of Ukraine etc.

#ISIL - This topic covers the impact and meaning of ISIL on the Middle East and rest of the world and why the region has been so fractured for so long. Subtopics could include US interventionism, the effects of the breakup of the Ottoman empire, 9/11 and the Afghanistant and Iraq War, caliphates etc.

#Yemen - Possible topics include the Iranian influence on events, the possibility and history of two independent Yemens, Al-Qaeda's impact on Yemen, why Yemen has been failing etc.

#France - We could discuss the impact of the shooting, the history of events, reactions to it (French, Islamic and worldwide), implications etc.

For now, that's it. If anyone wants to start a new topic, simply make a post with the new hashtag in the title and give us a springboard to start the discussion.

Last edited by TDCadmin; May 4, 2015 at 07:11 PM.
This will probably turn into toribash flame club.

Whatever put me on the list please.
oxisudofrenohypoglycemolicodin
Not if we've got anything to say about it. This isn't meant to be about attacking one another. It's about trying to explain how things ended up the way they are. If there's a disagreement on a topic, then as decent human beings, you'll reach an understanding without being nasty to another. Nastiness = you getting kicked out.
Last edited by Ele; Jan 22, 2015 at 02:12 PM.
Confirming I'm in this thing.
Originally Posted by d3noth View Post
This will probably turn into toribash flame club.

Whatever put me on the list please.

Only if your first sentence wasn't the intent you posted your second sentence with.
#Ukraine

If you want to understand this conflict then one of the things you have to understand is how Russia views the West. Ever since the Russian Civil War (1917-21), they have been deeply suspicious of West. And rightly so. The West supported the 'Whites' (the communists were called the 'Reds') and essentially tried to strangle the Soviet Union in its infancy. Obviously, the West didn't make the best first impression.

Slap on another 20 or so years and the Russians felt they won WWII on the Eastern Front by themselves (fun fact: more people died on the Eastern Front than in the entirety of WW1), with little support from their supposed allies. Shortly thereafter, Churchill declared the iron curtain of communism would descend across Europe, and with that we were plunged into the Cold War.

I'm sure I don't need to remind anyone about the hostilities that occured during the Cold War. Suffice to say, by the time the Cold War had ended and the Soviet Union dissolved, the Russians were extremely wary of West. We made a deal with them. We said we wouldn't extend the borders of NATO (the coalition of Western countries thats purpose was for collective security between countries against Russia (and the Warsaw Pact), if they agreed to the unification of Germany.

So, what did NATO do? Expanded eastwards of course! Breaking the deal, they quickly incorporated the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia, Romania etc. into NATOs zone of operations. Betraying the trust of an already suspicious and distrustful Russia. Because of this, Western-Russian relations have been in the shitter ever since.

Now imagine the current situation, but pretend that the roles were reversed. Your little brother Mexico holds a democratic election and they determine their new leader. All of a sudden, the new leader is overthrown, and a new leader sympathetic to your historical enemy takes charge. You later find out that the historic enemy actually had a hand in coup, helping it along. What do you think Americans would do? Do you think they would stand something like this for even a second?

That's the precarious situation we find ourselves in with Russia. To make matters worse, we've set up a whole bunch of red lines and tripwire forces that'll instanly put us into a war with Russia if they're crossed. We keep poking and prodding the Russians, all to ignorant of how very badly things will end up if the Russians respond accordingly. We're walking a very dangerous tightrope, and the potential for complete disaster is so much higher than any other situation we're in right now, ISIL included.
Last edited by Ele; Jan 22, 2015 at 02:54 PM.
Posting to confirm.
All it takes is one bad day to reduce the sanest man alive to lunacy. That’'s how far the world is from where I am. Just one bad day.
Originally Posted by hawkesnightmare View Post
Posting to confirm.

I am also posting to confirm.
Good morning sweet princess
#Ukraine

Ele explained the lead-up to today's political situation pretty nicely.

Russia was weakened from the transition to capitalism from 75 years of socialism and central planning. The dissolution of the USSR disoriented most of it's former member states and it's puppets, which was seen as an opportunity by the US and allies to expand to Russia's doorstep without serious consequences.

Ukraine is the "property" of Russia, with the idea of an independent Ukraine being a relatively new thing to begin with. There's no real unified national identity, with the population split between ethnic Ukrainians to the west and ethnic Russians to the east and southeast (there are some other minorities as well, like Hungarians in Ruthenia and the Tatars in Crimea, but they aren't important in the grand scale of things as of now). The Russians simply can't let an integral part of their sphere of influence to fall into Western hands, hence the annexation of Crimea and the "stealth invasion" of Novorossiya.

What I personally find curious, however, is the nature of the ongoing conflict. Russia isn't committing a serious force (~10 000 "volunteers" according to various estimates, with ~60 000 personnel on the border), which is somewhat understandable in light of their rhetoric regarding the topic. What I don't understand, though, is why Ukraine doesn't commit to the conflict in 100% capacity. I've been following the daily reports on Wikipedia (link), and there are no air strikes from Kiev's part whatsoever. They have 50 000 soldiers committed directly to the conflict from a total of 250 000. Why are they reacting so soft? It took them months to retake the Donetsk Airport, where they already had to give up the main terminal due to poison gas attacks. Are they afraid of further escalation? I wonder what goes through Porosenko's mind.

EDIT: Just found some info on why the Ukrainian Air Force is sitting idly. The ceasefire they signed with the rebels prohibits the use of air units (why the hell they'd sign that is beyond me, the rebels shouldn't have ANY airpower, not even planes provided by Russia). I wonder when this goes out the window, though.
Last edited by ynvaser; Jan 23, 2015 at 05:08 PM.