Originally Posted by
Sucy
Just realized I kinda entirely glossed over Oscar100
I get that but with the inactive people there's 21 people which would mean 10 or 11 people would have to go in game regularly which might not work.
Having 16 people (excluding the bank of course) and getting 8 of the to go in and do wars or mess around and whatever is easy.
So far the people I see that go in game at least somewhat often are McNuggets, Hikou, Saturn, Typhon, Grrreatest, Mateo, Frost, you and I.
Everyone else has a day or more between their last game, I know that basing a game a day as a bottom line is extensive maybe but having our current 10 in game active players go in regularly because there's 5 people that aren't even around is also a bit dumb imo
Honestly I can't even remember the last time any of those 5 spoke in the Discord or on forums.
We already hit the activity criteria without even knowing that it was being changed/checked; until we get a warning, I don't think we need to make any changes for the sake of ingame activity. When/if we receive a warning, we can start to think about making changes like what you're suggesting - but as long as we're hitting those 50 points each month, there's no obvious benefit to aiming for higher than that.
The way I see it is that we're almost definitely going to get 20 points per month for forum activity. At a normal rate, we'll probably complete one war per month. That leaves us with around
28-30 points out of 45 that we need to aim for in regards to ingame activity (at an estimate). Knowing that 50% of our members being active makes for a full 45 points, 30 points would mean that around 33% of our members need to be active ingame, which, if you think about it, is super easy.
The new guidelines are, in my opinion, way more lenient than everyone seems to be making them out to be. 5 games per month are hardly anything (10 minutes per month?). We should reach the 50 points mark very easily.