Ranking
Original Post
Boko Haram killed 2000 people in Nigeria
Boko Haram killed 2000 people in Baga, Nigeria last week, and my first question is, why was it ignored while the world was mourning over some journalists? I'm not disrespecting those who worked on Charlie Hebdo nor the cops who fought the terrorist, but why did no one care for these - possible - 2000 deaths?

http://www.theguardian.com/world/201...-ignored-media

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2015/01...re-reportedly/

http://mobile.news.com.au/world/afri...-1227180726580
Last edited by Rial; Jan 13, 2015 at 11:10 PM.
:^)
I kind of see why you made this topic. It's a horrible event, but you won't see anyone get passionate about it like people did with the French attacks.
This was a post in the Islam thread. I moved it to a new topic because killing 2000 people in the name of Allah has as much to do with Islam as Hitler with Christianity.

It is somewhat grotesque that the killing goes widely ignored while the death of a bunch of journalists keeps the world in check.
That is hardly surprising though.

Feel free to talk about Boko Haram and what can be done about it. It is a very interesting topic to discuss.
Some food for thought:
Who can have an interest in funding Islamic fundamentalists so they can go around occupying territories?
What do you think about the political situations in these regions? For instance the ongoing voting campaign that entirely ignores the Boko Haram is something that could make one wonder what the hell is going on there.
What are factors that lead to such radicalism in that area?

Also feel free to discuss similar issues that are comparable.
Originally Posted by Redundant View Post
This was a post in the Islam thread. I moved it to a new topic because killing 2000 people in the name of Allah has as much to do with Islam as Hitler with Christianity.

It is somewhat grotesque that the killing goes widely ignored while the death of a bunch of journalists keeps the world in check.
That is hardly surprising though.

Feel free to talk about Boko Haram and what can be done about it. It is a very interesting topic to discuss.
Some food for thought:
Who can have an interest in funding Islamic fundamentalists so they can go around occupying territories?
What do you think about the political situations in these regions? For instance the ongoing voting campaign that entirely ignores the Boko Haram is something that could make one wonder what the hell is going on there.
What are factors that lead to such radicalism in that area?

Also feel free to discuss similar issues that are comparable.

Indeed this is a pretty good discussion itself, I didn't make the thread specifically for it since we were already discussing the religion of this terrorist group. I understand your point though.

Also, we've had the same thought. It's saddening to think how a few journalists are killed on a rich country and the whole world goes on mourning, while 2000 people are killed in Nigeria and no one gives a shit.

Anyway, generally poverty leads to radicalism and extremism. Especially because in poverty, people people tend to look for god in their times of need. With time, they are almost brainwashed with ideas that doing what religious leaders say will guaranteee them in whatever post-life paradise they believe in.
Of course, this is not a rule, and not always happens like this. But religion tends to be a mass-controller, and it's easy to control those who have nothing but their faith.
:^)
what if this happened in a more powerful country? ie russia, united states or japan/china?

Who has power has immunity
[ http://imgur.com/R0qHnXP ] - - - How to pronounce my name (ikr): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GUeiX2bPgwY
The media decided Charlie Hedbo would sell more papers/generate more traffic. It's as simple and cynical as that.
Also, why is it surprising that the West gives more crap about events that happen in the West? I'm pretty sure Nigerians don't give a crap about Charlie Hebdo either.
Wow that's a good question. There isn't a reason it shouldn't be ignored. Nothing is "ignored" it's just the way the freakin dudes up there talk about whatever they want.
Chickster: I literally don't know why I did it.
Maybe it isn't being publicized so people don't think Boko Haram is powerful and try to join them, kinda like what happened with ISIS.

Thoughts?
Originally Posted by Ele View Post
The media decided Charlie Hedbo would sell more papers/generate more traffic. It's as simple and cynical as that.

Charlie Hebdo was simply put just more relatable for the masses.
It is looked upon as an attack on freedom of speech and all of that, not just another shooting.
There's so much people can talk about regarding the Charlie Hebdo shooting, like the livestreams, the shooters who seemingly got away, the hero who saved a bunch of people, etc.

I wish we'd be hearing more of this killing of 2000 people.
PM me with any and all questions