Originally Posted by Gynx

I've answered that question, I'm not bullshitting anyone. If you actually read what we were saying in our posts you'd know that members coming out of inactivity to respond to an inactivity check doesn't make those members active.

Originally Posted by SkulFuk

It encourages clans to look after themselves & it's healthier for them.

Originally Posted by Gynx

You also only have to scroll up on this thread for ample reasoning as to why forum inactive clans shouldn't be kept official.

Originally Posted by Gynx

Honestly, if we're going to sit here and talk in circles because you can't be bothered to read the information we've given you I'll just stop responding to you on the basis of me not entertaining your ignorance.

Originally Posted by deprav

This is just getting childish. Oldies making drama because their obviously inactive clan is officialy deemed inactive. You're still all on the same planet and connected to the internet with a shitload of ways to communicate among yourselves. If you still have some interest for the game, revive your clan and give it the means to be active, or make a new clans with other oldies.
You had fun with Toribash for all those years, and if you can't undestand a community based multiplayer game needs some community maintenance for its own sake, and forgive it for that, you're being pretty immature, or selfish.

edit : a game needs to live, not cherish the old players like special snowflakes at the cost of its own image.

Originally Posted by ImmortalPig

I'm sure you would happily accept it if fl0w was marked for deletion according to secret rules.

Originally Posted by deprav

Well not happily, but I would accept and I wouldn't harass the clan council for unnecessary explainations ; because I like playing Toribash no matter what and we prepared for the eventuality we'd become too inactive in the eyes of the Clan Council, as we had some pretty quiet periods... but we're still active and kickin' afterall.

When you make/join a clan, it's pretty clear from the start that activity is a condition for the clan to exist, even 5 years ago, it has never been a big secret.

Originally Posted by ImmortalPig

Yet again this is incompatible with Skul's theory;

Originally Posted by ImmortalPig

You also only have to scroll up on this thread to see me telling you that you have not posted any legitimate reasons.

Originally Posted by ImmortalPig

Maybe you should stop with this anti-discussion attitude. Even when I directly ask you a question you deflect. If I ask you for clarification you refuse. When asked for information you purposefully withhold it so you can claim everyone else is ignorant.

What is the point in you even posting? This is the discussion subforum mate, the minimum requirement is that you are open to discussion.

Originally Posted by ImmortalPig

I'm sure you would happily accept it if fl0w was marked for deletion according to secret rules.

For real though you have like 4 active members, get your shit together or you really will be deleted. You need more than 10 aparently.

Originally Posted by ImmortalPig

You are not as active as other clans that have already been deleted, so I wonder if you really will just accept it.

The exact definition of 'active' is the big secret. Obviously your definition is far more inactive that then one used by the current council.

Originally Posted by Gynx

How does me stating members are inactive who, when they fail an activity check, make one post saying "we are active" then leave forever until the next time they fail do anything to be incompatible with SkulFuk's theory? If they come back & stay then I'd say we've done our job. It's happened before and is a direct result of our checks - I'd say that itself is evidence that clans evaluate themselves and try to keep the fire alive. Nobody is bullshitting here, but you're free to say what you want.

Originally Posted by Gynx

You actually haven't responded to any of my reasoning, so I guess now it is you who is bullshitting! A ha!

Originally Posted by Gynx

Discussing things is fine but if you're going to make a criticism on forum policy without reading the information given to you first you are going to be ignored when you say something stupid. You've tried to find inconsistencies in what we are saying throughout this whole discussion when none are apparent as opposed to having any legitimate issue with the system.

Originally Posted by Gynx

Your argument boils down to "why don't we just allow inactive official clans to stay?" and we've told you why - you disagreeing with our reasoning doesn't mean we have to explain the same thing every time. That isn't anti-discussion, it's anti-retarded. You're not bringing anything new to the table except your occasional light-bulb "BUT WAIT, THIS DOESN'T MATCH UP!" malarkey which has always been a result of you not reading anything that has been said and are expecting brand new explanations from us as if you've slam-dunked our logic. You haven't. If there's no better reason for keeping dead clans as official than "why not?" I'd say that the reasoning to remove them far outweighs reasoning to keep them.

Originally Posted by Gynx

Hey! This is discussion, stop being so anti-discussion! You bullshitter, you.