Original Post
Difference between CUDA Cores and Stream Processores?
read the title
I want to know what is better between both of them.
Why does Nvidia have 1500+ CUDA cores for the gtx 690 which is a lot
stronger than the 6990 having 3000+ stream processors.
I want to know what is better between both of them.
Why does Nvidia have 1500+ CUDA cores for the gtx 690 which is a lot
stronger than the 6990 having 3000+ stream processors.
Definitely not Josh Lintag
first site in google: http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/forum/...ream-processor
first comment:
first comment:
they are the same. i believe the exact name is stream processor (SP) but since the Fermi architecture nvidia change the name to CUDA cores
0x6869706F7469626F72
~
It's not necessarily just the question of number of cores. The actual architecture and chip design matters a lot as well. A Pentium 433 clocked to 4.0 GHz won't outperform an i7, for example.
The family and market position of a card is far more effective at determining power than actual core numbers and whatnot, for most people. The 690 is better than the 680 which is better than the 580 which is better than the 480.
The family and market position of a card is far more effective at determining power than actual core numbers and whatnot, for most people. The 690 is better than the 680 which is better than the 580 which is better than the 480.
Squad Squad Squad lead?
The standardization of Toribash Squad roles may have gone too far!
The standardization of Toribash Squad roles may have gone too far!