Arguing from a moral position, animals cannot give consent, so theoretically we're testing on living beings that have the mindset of 2-3 year old children who have done nothing wrong.
The film, The Plague Dogs, gives you an insight into the type of cruelty that was going in the 60s and 70s in regards to animal testing. Not much has changed since then, despicably.
Man must ask whether he is entitled to treat his fellow beings in such a way that takes him back to prehistory.
The film, The Plague Dogs, gives you an insight into the type of cruelty that was going in the 60s and 70s in regards to animal testing. Not much has changed since then, despicably.
Man must ask whether he is entitled to treat his fellow beings in such a way that takes him back to prehistory.
It's either us or the animals we test on and I for one would choose the animal than to see a human going through pain from bad chemicals and such. This I guess is why we need people like Mengele and stuff. Science can only move so fast using animals, but actually using another human would bring results a lot faster.
Also Deathrow inmates forfeited their basic human rights already, they're human, but they're not People..
Also Deathrow inmates forfeited their basic human rights already, they're human, but they're not People..
There will always happen unlucky things when you test things on animals, I do not choose a side to whether yes or no these days, if you are a skilled scientist and you are able to adapt theory on a full understood practise(I think we are far from understanding our human body/mental and other shifts in ourselfs) then you should have enough balls for testing it out on yourself.
Enjoint life
Scientists don't need balls, they need brains and testing on subjects and not yourself falls into the category of brains.
Having a scientist fall ill to their creation is just not good for the rest of the non-scientists, the scientist could die without even fixing the problem and we are just left with a broken unfinished theory, which is why we need the animals.
Having a scientist fall ill to their creation is just not good for the rest of the non-scientists, the scientist could die without even fixing the problem and we are just left with a broken unfinished theory, which is why we need the animals.
