Toribash
Originally Posted by Addicter View Post
My laptop has an ATi graphic card. I'm quite happy with it, but I would still prefer an nVidia. Mainly because they have less problems with videogames.

are you joking?

left 4 dead had massive problems with nvidia, as did crysis.
I have an ati card now for almost two years and I still happy with it. The only problem I had in that time, was that I didn't get GTA4 running.
KiTFoX: "COMPLETELY DISREGARD EVERYTHING I SAID. I SUCK COPIOUS AMOUNTS OF COCK."

Fura: What can I say? The pure definition of cool <3 ~BirdFlu

<RedDevil> Is it strange that Fura is the only regular Wibbler I like
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
ⓄⓁⒹⒶ ⓋⒾⒷⒺ ⒶⓁⒶⓃ ⒷⒾⓈⒽ
Ohey look over there, a dancing dinosaur. :D
hanz0: The betting bot isn't programmed to scam anyone.

Fee: Fura you are fucking awesome.
nVidia has less problems across the board, especially in OpenGL. nVidia also has CUDA, the new version of PhysX. I don't know of any advantages that ATI has. :X
I've been using nVidia cards all my life. Never had a problem and they have served me well. Also I've heard so many horror stories about ATI drivers that I'm afraid of switching.
i have a totally post modern tattoo of a scalene triangle.
<DeadorK> fair maiden
<DeadorK> if the cum is going to be in your mouth
<DeadorK> it shall be in mine as well
Nvidia is the best GPU makers but always late to release video cards.

ATi Just make GPU.
http://*******.com/ygo7plb >Sex, Porn and Even Hampa's sex
the GTX295 from galaxy(nivida based) is a GTX 260 and a GTX 280 in one card and it 1.7gb vid memory but needs a 600W pcu to run it
i saw it on a vid on metacafe u can search it
This is quite a massive trolling thread.


Ex-Nvidia fanboy here;
However I will say that ATI are wayyyy ahead.

Honestly, Nvidia make some awesome stuff, but they are behind in graphics cards at the moment. I would definatly go with ATI if i were you.
When I see you, my heart goes DOKI⑨DOKI
Fish: "Gorman has been chosen for admin. After a lengthy discussion we've all decided that Gorman is the best choice for the next admin."
Originally Posted by BitBuster View Post
nVIDIA, ATI may have dx10, nVidia has nVIDIA Physx, nVIDIA 3d and that kind of stuff. nVIDIA cards also have less problems with video games in general. (like The Saboteur not working on ATI cards etc.)

You mean Dx11.
I'm playing Saboteur on an ATI card (ATI Radeon Mobility HD2600). You can't blame the GPU brand for the developers of the game not making a stable game to be run under the major graphics cards without a patch. Thats the developers business.

Plus proprietary physics processor such as PhysX sucks for us, consumers. We need something without royalties attached so we can enjoy it on all cards without the prices going into speculation. Thats one reason why you shouldn't be happy about PhysX, unless you like to invest a large part of your money into overpriced gimmick monopolistic technologies that will never benefit the consumers on a large scale.
Last edited by GenkiSudo; Feb 16, 2010 at 06:25 PM.
"There is enough on earth for everybody's need, but not for everyone's greed." - Mohandas Gandhi
ya i saw the new ati card have shader modul 5 and thats good still 50% of the games rec shader 3 and some 4 so 5 is realy good
I thought it was two 280's

and yeah, it feels like a lot of the posts are incredibly biased. I think we can all agree that until nvidia releases it's next batch of cards, ati has and has had the market. The dx11 cards from ati seem pretty powerful to me, and that's what I think their adv right now. That and price.

But is dx11 worth missing physx?
Last edited by DarkJak; Feb 16, 2010 at 06:32 PM.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Gimp is Pimp(tm)

DarkJak's Wide-Range Texture Shop[LINK]

Incognito - [o]