View Poll Results: Do you agree?
Yes
84 Votes / 74.34%
No
29 Votes / 25.66%
Voters: 113. You may not vote on this poll
View Poll Results
View Poll Results
That wasnt what I was trying to say. Just saying we need some improvement to support clan development..
like: max times you can create a clan and switch clans
If some people keep creating clans that die quickly, cant it be expected that they are bad leaders?
adding rules about these might make the actual populace think about clan consistency, not just the people who are recognized by the mods/admins
like: max times you can create a clan and switch clans
If some people keep creating clans that die quickly, cant it be expected that they are bad leaders?
adding rules about these might make the actual populace think about clan consistency, not just the people who are recognized by the mods/admins
Last edited by Zaarock; Feb 8, 2008 at 11:56 PM.
I disagree with some of your chart there Tonakai. I see UNCE a lot more then some of the clans you put up higher. Also Cannibal is very active most of us are on everyday for at least an hour.
"When the pin is pulled, Mr. Grenade is not our friend."
-U.S. Army Training Notice
-U.S. Army Training Notice
*breaks door*
I think only [MAD] qualifies for removement, perhaps also [LotA], as all the other clans are active to a certain point, and those others who are a bit shaky atm can still be saved.
Originally Posted by Redwards
I disagree with some of your chart there Tonakai. I see UNCE a lot more then some of the clans you put up higher. Also Cannibal is very active most of us are on everyday for at least an hour.
I don't see UNCE so much on.
I don't see Cnbl members either, but that's because of the time zone.
Originally Posted by CMon
I think only [MAD] qualifies for removement, perhaps also [LotA], as all the other clans are active to a certain point, and those others who are a bit shaky atm can still be saved.
No MAD.
I asked hampa why he keep MAD alive (kinda), he said why not.
Originally Posted by thegnome54
How did you calculate this data?
I'm in TCaP, and every time I go on I see at least two or three other members on the server. That's much more than can be said for most clans, from my experience. In fact, "Lords of the Apocalypse" and "Maraud and Decapitate" both scored grossly worse than my clan, and you didn't mention either in your kill list. What's up with that?
Are you sure you didn't just invent these 'ratings'?
LotA is on the list, get eyes.
No MAD.
I asked hampa why he keep MAD alive (kinda), he said why not.
I don't see TCaP members so much on.
Originally Posted by Lightningkid
OK.
1: Do you know what Maraud and Decapitate is? Its MAD, hampas clan.
2. I have to agree, I don't see any TCaP people.
The truth.
Originally Posted by 3vi1
I wouldn't agree with DAT being rated so lowly, they're highly active overall. Also, I see more TCaP members than I do LotA members. Finally, have you taken the time to think that these ratings may well be entirely relative? From what I see, DAT deserves at a ++ in ingame activity, spirit a - at worst, and Guru a - at worst. I see members of each of these clans every day.
I have seen DAT's activeness go down.
My chart is untrustable, I made it in kinda hurry, just looked up at the member lists and thought who are active and who are not, and kinda summed them up.
Making better when I get my @#$%& new laptop...
I'm sorry.
Originally Posted by Gynx
Four words; Bring back the Council
Two words; I agree.
Lol, and I'd like to be part of it. :3
If we do a new Council...
Last edited by Tonakai; Feb 9, 2008 at 03:49 PM.
