Originally Posted by Tubba75
Physically, time travel IS possible. You see, when Astronauts fly out of orbit and into out space, they come back so fast that they actually travel backwards in time, but on a microscopic scale, less than 0.000001 Milliseconds. Thus meaning we would need to go so fast in outer space that we go back years, but how do we do so? Orbit around a black hole. How does it work? Simple. A Black hole is actually just an amazingly large build-up of mass, thus, being the heaviest mass with the strongest pull, orbiting it can send us flying in circles faster than the speed of light, but it only feels like a minimal speed to the astronauts. Thus, after re-landing on earth, they could be as far back as the 1970s from now in a matter of circling around a black hole maybe...6 times? Yeah, I know..It's crazy, huh?
This whole paragraph sounds like complete bullshit. Would you mind posting some sources that verify these claims? Because, one, it has been proven that you cannot travel faster than the speed of light, two, you could not orbit a black hole because the gravitational pull would be too strong to sustain orbit, and, three, speed is measured in distance traveled in a certain duration of time mean time is going forward to measure speed, so how can speed, a measurement that is based on forward time result in time going backwards?
Last edited by IceShadow; Jan 16, 2011 at 09:51 AM.
[RAWR]NutHug: I CAN MAKE DIAPER BROWN
Or you could be even more creative and just marry his mother before his father does, and impregnate her with your sperm and thus, hitler would never be born. That way, you don't have to commit murder and you get to have sex Instead.
But yeah I remember watching some kind of video that showed how you could never alter any past events because they are set in stone and something would prevent you from doing it like for example your gun jamming or you tripping and falling right before you are about to save someone from getting hit by a bus.
But yeah I remember watching some kind of video that showed how you could never alter any past events because they are set in stone and something would prevent you from doing it like for example your gun jamming or you tripping and falling right before you are about to save someone from getting hit by a bus.
[RAWR]NutHug: I CAN MAKE DIAPER BROWN
Nobody fucks with the Jesus
Tubba made some erroneous conclusions based on the time dilation phenomenon.
But in regards to thread, i think that if u could go back in time, whatever u do will affect a different future, u're future would be left unchanged, but u would be crating a parallel future. So if u went back to u're original time u would see no difference but if u stayed in the past u would see different events. Hence there are two parallel time lines
I think u cannot change u're past but only u're future.
But in regards to thread, i think that if u could go back in time, whatever u do will affect a different future, u're future would be left unchanged, but u would be crating a parallel future. So if u went back to u're original time u would see no difference but if u stayed in the past u would see different events. Hence there are two parallel time lines
I think u cannot change u're past but only u're future.
Last edited by missuse; Jan 16, 2011 at 11:04 AM.
wishful eyes deceive me
The reason that this situation consistantly comes out with a paradox is because, quite simply, backwards time travel is an impossibilty. Trying to explain it is like trying to find out the length of a unicorn's horn - You're never going to come to a conclusion, because there isn't a conclusion to come to.
Quit, probably.
