Argument suggestions
You could argue that a whole range of environmental factors determined by gender can lead to suitability in certain roles, this combined with the genuine physical trends in strength and size owe themselves to the justification of such a system. I accept that conscription only being applied to one sex is unfair, but I also feel like the injustice of conscription itself can blur the actual standalone discrimination into being less just than it is in reality. It seems feasible to argue that conscription might not fit the criteria of sexism as long as the just nature of assuming men more fit for conscription can be proven.
To summarise, it does not matter how much it sucks that men have to suffer more than women in this instance if the belief that men are more suited to such a role is logical or justified.
To be honest I would struggle to pull together a convincing argument that such blatant discrimination was justifiable, but I felt like I should point out that there is such an argument to be had if you enjoy disagreeing with pig.
Perhaps we could look in more detail at the countries that still have conscription for men and compare it to the way those countries treat women. By the sound of it most of them (judging by the fact kyure said " have pretty bad wraps for both sexes (Middle East, Northern Africa and Northern Asia). However, you would have to pray that immortal pig doesn't notice that you went back on your claim that sexism against men and that against women are incomparable. I am not willing to do research for you right now but it might be worth looking into to balance this debate.
I am not offering any of my own views because when I do that they always end up being wrong. I am just trying to give either side equal firepower.
To summarise, it does not matter how much it sucks that men have to suffer more than women in this instance if the belief that men are more suited to such a role is logical or justified.
To be honest I would struggle to pull together a convincing argument that such blatant discrimination was justifiable, but I felt like I should point out that there is such an argument to be had if you enjoy disagreeing with pig.
Perhaps we could look in more detail at the countries that still have conscription for men and compare it to the way those countries treat women. By the sound of it most of them (judging by the fact kyure said " have pretty bad wraps for both sexes (Middle East, Northern Africa and Northern Asia). However, you would have to pray that immortal pig doesn't notice that you went back on your claim that sexism against men and that against women are incomparable. I am not willing to do research for you right now but it might be worth looking into to balance this debate.
I am not offering any of my own views because when I do that they always end up being wrong. I am just trying to give either side equal firepower.
Good morning sweet princess
Even in voluntary military service, entry standards for women are lower than they are for men. They should be equal, because an ISIS militant won't hold back or go easy on you just because you're a female.
Let's not talk about ISIS and all that though, stick to feminism and whatnot.
Here's a source to back up your argument: TIME.com
~Proto
Let's not talk about ISIS and all that though, stick to feminism and whatnot.
Here's a source to back up your argument: TIME.com
~Proto
Last edited by Zelda; Feb 19, 2015 at 01:12 PM.
I haven't looked into the legitimacy of the guy's claims in the link yet so you might want to check it yourself at some point and perhaps replace it with a better source eventually.
Some of the points he rose where strong though. Recruiters should focus more on the standard of the recruits rather than just choosing people for the sake of greater diversity. This probably goes for all areas of employment (as long as the work does not involve ethnic or gender based issues where being a certain skin colour or gender could lead to distrust or disrespect).
Some of the points he rose where strong though. Recruiters should focus more on the standard of the recruits rather than just choosing people for the sake of greater diversity. This probably goes for all areas of employment (as long as the work does not involve ethnic or gender based issues where being a certain skin colour or gender could lead to distrust or disrespect).
Good morning sweet princess
