Originally Posted by
siku
we have GATA and Unibash already, both free. also he shamelessly edited Art forum README to advertise his expensive org
To be fair, befor unibash, there was TAS, where there was a fee to get in, to pay the teachers/tutorial makers because art fags are lazy faggots.
HJS used to charge 20k for entrance to very average tutorials, TAS charged 5k.
It is also where all the tutorials in the unibash section come from. The only reason that TAS is no longer with us, is because of the roll back, we lost a large portion of the tutorials and didnt feel it was worthwhile trying to convince the others to re-write them.
I see the redundancy factor, seeing as unibash is still around, but highly inactive, due to no one knowing where or what unibash is. I will have some words with doxxy and fish to see if we can remedy this.
Originally Posted by
William
So...what if the quality of teachers doesn't suit us?If the org is in anyway against the rules,then pointing me to the rule that it breaks would be quite helpful.
Also,I don't think gata actually teaches other artists,it's more of an org for elite artists.
the quality of teachers is the same in every org there is, or has been, because they are the same all the time. its the same members making the effort every time.
TATA is the same as TAS and unibash, just without one or two members and has jebus
quality of teachers from one place to another shouldnt be a question.
also no, gata isnt a teaching org. the idea behind gata is that it is to be a place for established/successfull/good artists to get together and discuss art and improving together without having teachers.
Last edited by BenDover; Feb 12, 2012 at 12:13 PM.
