It's a silly story that you might as well not even worry about to tell the truth. It would just lead to more questions.
-----

I usually rank people up who I think are serious about this... but you seem more serious about this than most that were in the clan so sure.

Awesome! Moncho's gonna rank up! And sorry if this is seen as spamming but i'm just trying to keep activity up while all the clans are in chaos. Oh, and congratz on being rank 3 on the leaderboard. And whats gonna happen to the competition? Didnt everyones replays get erased?

KOco am I gonna rank up too?Did you reset the forum?I think its good.

@Koco: Then can u also rank up me in zone

@Canibal No, she didn't reset the forums... It's a weird story. :/

Yes I think you definitely deserve it. Good job so far.
-----

However I'm still thinking on you.
-----
@Zone: As you may have noticed I put my usercard as my name under the leader spot. I'm asking you to post your user card so I can do the same thing for all of you. Personally I think it would look so much better that a list of names.

I love the clan
I was a member and lasted here.
I wanted to apologize
You probably will not accept
request single ally.
Thanks...
-----
Koco934: Just one question
Have irc?

@Koco I think maybe there should be 3 co-leaders if possible so the co-leaders have less to handle (if you decide to make 1 more co-leader I would only volunteer if no one else can)

@Koco: not to be all bossy and stuff but can u fix my name on the clan members section of the first post? thanks

Accepted and yes we do. I'm about to add it to the first post.
-----

I'll think about it. The main reason I have two co-leaders is so that we have an odd number of the main decision makers. Like if we had three co-leaders and something came up and two of us were thinking one thing while the other two were thinking another then it would be more difficult to come to a conclusion. However Having three co-leaders could make any decision more absolute or even more fair. Like if we do what we do now and have two c-leaders and two of us say one thing but the other disagrees, the one lone one might have a valid point to why they think that way. The extra co-leader might be enough to make it so that doesn't happen as easily. But like I said earlier I'll think about it.