Originally Posted by
absaglute
i think i was trying to give advice on stuff to do. but it sorta makes me uncomfortable to tell people to do stuff. probably because i don't have a solid footing in my mind to do that, and also secondarily some part of me thinks that telling people to do stuff blames them for not following rules I make up. i think that's probably not the case but I'm not sure why. at the same time I see how it totally works depending
i think it just depends on context/setup. well, that and how you respond to how
they respond to your advice. But "setup"-wise, advice/guidelines that have been asked for seem fine. And they also don't seem like "rules" necessarily, unless you try to enforce them. I don't think I asked for advice, but I also didn't take your ideas/offerings as rules or as something you would be bothered by me not jumping to follow, so I didn't have a problem.
(edit: Rethinking "I don't think I asked for advice", I
was making some effort to walk so I
was on some level open to tips/suggestions, but I still like experimenting on my own, and following rules really doesn't seem like the most efficient way to
really learn something, so I wasn't likely to treat any tips as rules regardless.)
rules can probably be fine too in context. like if two people agree on a rule, and they both have the authority to change their mind about it, or something. or if it's some kind of life or death situation and the rule-maker knows what's up, etc. Although "life or death situation and the rule-maker knows what's up" is the basis for some religions so even that is... situational.
Originally Posted by
absaglute
the same part of me thinks that improving the world is selfish, especially if nobody else wants it changed. like the steven universe human zoo episode. makes everyone cry.
idk depends on underlying motive and exact method and also Complicated Situational Factors(TM). i don't seem to feel much drive to improve "the world" on the large scale, although, thinking about it, I should probably at least research more than I do and vote since it's not like i don't think Shit's Fucked(TM) in various ways, but I don't think it's healthy to feel that responsible for things so far outside myself. at least i'm not much of a Consumer.
i'd vote for someone who made it less legal or more expensive to continuously release New and Improved versions of things/tech every year because holy fuck can we just say we have "pretty amazing" phones/computers/clothing etc now and stop churning out endless streams of new shit to go in the garbage? thanks. bonus points if more stuff was produced that was designed be usable forever and be maintainable/reparable or at least genuinely recyclable.
also: more biodegradable stuff, mandatorily. less endless production of things that will barely be used and will end up clogging some natural ecosystem somewhere. yeah.
i mean the planet will become uninhabitable
eventually, when the sun fucking burns out or whatever it does a very long time from now, but what's the rush. when can we start doing things sustainably. come on.
Originally Posted by
absaglute
also the episode makes me think of God.
i don't like thinking about "God" if i can help it
I spent enough time on that in my childhood and I think it was unnecessarily stressful
Originally Posted by
absaglute
i want to segue into the We Bare Bears show episode where the bears worship/fight over a $100 bill. i hated that episode. but i think i can relate it to a lot of things. ugh.
I've actually never heard of We Bare Bears before now. I can relate to hating watching an episode of a TV show but I can't relate to deliberately watching something I hate, or find ugly and demoralizing, or just banal and heavy-handed. which seems to be a lot of TV. I uh don't pay much attention to The News. i just wander off. idk if i want to watch this mentioned Human Zoo Episode.
Re: Movie Night: uhhhHHH I dunno I'll come back to this.
Re: Fight Club essay: ¡Qué interesante!
music time
Last edited by Brackass; Nov 14, 2019 at 10:58 AM.
Reason: é