Original Post
Slight Changes for Textures
My suggestion is to allow body textures to be transparent so you can see the colour of the gradient under it.
Joint textures are more like tattoos, they show over the colour of the joint. However, body textures don't do this. By making body textures "tattoos", you would be able to see the gradient colour under it. This would work really well with Pure colours, as pure is whiter than the normal white, so this way you dont have slightly greyed textures with the Pure force.
This would also help people who make textures to fit different sets, as instead of making multiple texture files with different colours, you can have one set with see-through parts in order to see the gradient underneath. While this may not be the best way to save Tc, it will help free some space on computers, and reduce clutter.
Joint textures are more like tattoos, they show over the colour of the joint. However, body textures don't do this. By making body textures "tattoos", you would be able to see the gradient colour under it. This would work really well with Pure colours, as pure is whiter than the normal white, so this way you dont have slightly greyed textures with the Pure force.
This would also help people who make textures to fit different sets, as instead of making multiple texture files with different colours, you can have one set with see-through parts in order to see the gradient underneath. While this may not be the best way to save Tc, it will help free some space on computers, and reduce clutter.
I don't think I need to state why this is a bad idea but if the textures are transparent you wont see them
now if you meant translucent.... its still a bad idea, everything would look really bad and it requires a bunch of unneeded scripts n stuff and I'm pretty sure you can do something like this by lowering the opacity of the image.'
Not Supported
now if you meant translucent.... its still a bad idea, everything would look really bad and it requires a bunch of unneeded scripts n stuff and I'm pretty sure you can do something like this by lowering the opacity of the image.'
Not Supported
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
| Nomad Moderated Message: |
| Be more straightforward with your uplifting messages or I'll fucking skin you alive. |
Originally Posted by Kirito
I don't think I need to state why this is a bad idea but if the textures are transparent you wont see them
now if you meant translucent.... its still a bad idea, everything would look really bad and it requires a bunch of unneeded scripts n stuff and I'm pretty sure you can do something like this by lowering the opacity of the image.'
Not Supported
That's not what I meant
I meant that IF you made a texture transparent, you would see the body part under it, rather that it just being black.
For instance, if you had marine gradients, and you had a black and transparent texture, the blue would show through the transparent parts.
This is already how it works with Joint Textures
Invisible textures are a bad idea.
You mean you have invisible parts of a texture and the color underneath shows like joints?
Doesn't it already do that?
Doesn't it already do that?
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
| Nomad Moderated Message: |
| Be more straightforward with your uplifting messages or I'll fucking skin you alive. |
Originally Posted by Kirito
You mean you have invisible parts of a texture and the color underneath shows like joints?
Doesn't it already do that?
It only does that for joints. It doesnt do it for body parts. It just turns black
