Ele, the problem in generalizing everything about it is just that it wont work good on real life. Like if a man get hit by a woman who really represents a threat to his physical condition (taller, thicker, mma figher, armed, whatever) and he responds to it, by your logic he stills wrong because
generally women does not represent a threat to men, so we wouldn't care if
that reaction was actually balanced.
By showing specific cases where women assaulted men Panda is showing that each case must be analysed so that we can get a better understanding, if it was a legitimate defense or if the guy just used (or tried to) it as a shield to hit a woman.
Adding something, it's still a fact that men tend to get more physical, not because its nature, but because what society expects him to do, a man can't get hit, it's worse if its from a girl <- this is vicious.
Last edited by IIInsanEEE; Jan 28, 2015 at 12:02 PM.