well, this disscusion is totaly onesided, to make this a searious one u need to concider the goverment as NOT NEEDED AT ALL. the easiest way to do this would be to look at accient societies where there where no tax what so ever for example; The indians in america. there is some clear evidence that you could come and go from the society and there was no goverment what so ever if u did not want to be a part of the society and well, what was the need of a goverment in that case; simply power, Efficency within a group and wars. So, there is clear evidence that it could work, if we do have the power to survive on our own, in the modern world, id say its impossible to live with our "circumstances" but well, move to siberia and hunt down your own food, have your own water source and find some wood to build a house and keep it warm. and on the "law" front, i think we with our own mind and the words "threat others as you want to be threated" works fine, if you want to get murdered, do bad. if you wanna live, do good, cause someday/if someone will have the chance to have a gun and end your life if they find reason for it. so well, a network of 20mil people could work, but they would just have to live on their own, not as a society if anarcy would work on a HUGE scale, cause if you gorm a group, either you have to thing exactly the same at all time, or you do not have 100% anarchy as you sometimes must give in to the group as a whole.
//// i have no working spellingprogram in english as its not my main lang, so please oversee my spelling and/or gramar mistakes
Last edited by Smogard49; Jan 2, 2011 at 01:34 AM.
Reason: Spelling =D