Ranking
Originally Posted by Donseluke View Post
As for the whole two party system here in America, Its actually not a two party system but people thinking it is, due to ignorance and the fact that the media only cares to cover the two parties and not any of the other ones really in my observations is all behind the whole thought process of that notion.

That's the definition of a two party system. It's not that there are only two parties, it's that there are two major parties of power. There's still a Socialist party and Communist party in America, but there's virtually no shot in hell they'll ever get voted in, so nobody focuses on them. The closest that anybody has ever had to upsetting the major parties in a presidential election was Ron Paul when he ran as an Independent. And he could of been classified as a Republican, except there can only be one Republican candidate on the presidential ticket the way it's set up, and the Republican party chose a different candidate.

The existence of other parties means nothing to the entire system if they don't have any power. Under the definition that the existence of other parties makes a political system a multi-party system, there is no such thing as a dictatorship. Every dictatorship has opposing parties to the ruling party, they just hold no political power.
nyan :3
Youtube Channel i sometimes post videos of other games
Originally Posted by Oracle View Post
That's the definition of a two party system. It's not that there are only two parties, it's that there are two major parties of power. There's still a Socialist party and Communist party in America, but there's virtually no shot in hell they'll ever get voted in, so nobody focuses on them. The closest that anybody has ever had to upsetting the major parties in a presidential election was Ron Paul when he ran as an Independent. And he could of been classified as a Republican, except there can only be one Republican candidate on the presidential ticket the way it's set up, and the Republican party chose a different candidate.

The existence of other parties means nothing to the entire system if they don't have any power. Under the definition that the existence of other parties makes a political system a multi-party system, there is no such thing as a dictatorship. Every dictatorship has opposing parties to the ruling party, they just hold no political power.

That certainly makes sense, Sorry for misunderstanding. I personally would have voted him because the fed being canned and money being backed by gold is definitely the most promising proposition i have yet to see another candidate propose and actually make sense on it. Sadly enough it didn't get much media attention. Better than money just being a glorified I.O.U.

Actually i did vote for him, but as long as we have this farce known as the electoral college in play the people will probably never have any real power beyond that without a total hostile encounter bringing true meaning to the "The tree of liberty must be baptized by the blood of patriots." quote.

But any more discussion of that and i will be given an honorary tin foil hat.

What really did it for me when it came to the current administration was the signing of the NDAA. Probably one of the most severe violations of the peoples constitutional rights and i find it shocking how few people actually know what it is and what it does.

I think its pretty much safe at this point to say we are more generally screwed than we were before. If we weren't already.
<Castra> I'm fingering my butthole right now
<Rainboweye> mocrogunz<Rainboweye> why do you eat smegma ?
The problem is that (mostly Republicans) doesn't want to shift ways with democrats. Each side is holding their ground instead of fixing this matter. Obama has done nothing wrong. Most blame to Republicans. (My opinion) Now, we can now have a default where we hit 17 trillion dollars in debt. If this happen, basically EVERYONE in the U.S is affected. Prices will probably go through the roof! Shit is gonna go down. (Sorry if this has nothing to do of the discussion)
Team Sad
Originally Posted by PerfectBro View Post
The problem is that (mostly Republicans) doesn't want to shift ways with democrats. Each side is holding their ground instead of fixing this matter. Obama has done nothing wrong. Most blame to Republicans. (My opinion) Now, we can now have a default where we hit 17 trillion dollars in debt. If this happen, basically EVERYONE in the U.S is affected. Prices will probably go through the roof! Shit is gonna go down. (Sorry if this has nothing to do of the discussion)

We like to forget that we elect these stubborn party members. Honestly, us choosing to blame one party over another in this matter is encouraging them to push harder and keep at more of a standstill. We seem to feel Party is more important than Policy. This is why our government is dominated by two extremely opposite and outlying parties.

This thread should be called "The US voters are idiots." We are the reasons that the parties lie to gain our votes, etc. Our blatant partisanship encourages stance alteration as well.

Only when our strong partisanship is dissuaded can our government stop acting like children and get down to the issues.
DAMN.
You can't always blame the voters for they don't know the WHOLE story of each politician wanting to be in the government. I mean come on, all the ads and commercials, etc about hating the other guy. Some are true and some are not. But how do voters know which one to believe?
Team Sad
Originally Posted by PerfectBro View Post
You can't always blame the voters for they don't know the WHOLE story of each politician wanting to be in the government. I mean come on, all the ads and commercials, etc about hating the other guy. Some are true and some are not. But how do voters know which one to believe?

There are more sources than just political propaganda presented by the party for the party. Honestly, if the voter doesn't know what they are voting for they are obviously voting solely as a result of their partisanship. I'm not saying all voters are bad, but I will say the majority of people who vote don't fully look into policies and instead base their vote off of the party, the politician's looks, vague statements they've heard from their peers, etc.



Look how educated the people who vote for the leader of the free world are.

Not saying this small case study is precise or accurate, but I'd say that its pretty safe to assume that most voters would answer similarly.
Last edited by Muur; Oct 11, 2013 at 09:50 PM.
DAMN.
Originally Posted by Muur View Post
There are more sources than just political propaganda presented by the party for the party. Honestly, if the voter doesn't know what they are voting for they are obviously voting solely as a result of their partisanship. I'm not saying all voters are bad, but I will say the majority of people who vote don't fully look into policies and instead base their vote off of the party, the politician's looks, vague statements they've heard from their peers, etc.



Look how educated the people who vote for the leader of the free world are.

Not saying this small case study is precise or accurate, but I'd say that its pretty safe to assume that most voters would answer similarly.

I know I just jumped in and blah blah. But that last statement contridicted itself. How can you say the study is probably inaccurate but still say its still pretty safe to assume most people would vote like that? I'm honestly wanting to pick into your brain.
Also to keep things on topic I'm not happy with my US government right now either and I truly am mad at all of them not just democrats or republicans.
But in all reality... I think I might be insane...
Originally Posted by Agentmax View Post
I know I just jumped in and blah blah. But that last statement contridicted itself. How can you say the study is probably inaccurate but still say its still pretty safe to assume most people would vote like that? I'm honestly wanting to pick into your brain.

Its not my brain that is saying its safe to assume that people would respond similarly. Its more along the lines of millions of exit polls that all have trends that lean toward voters being uneducated on government and policy. However, it does show quite blatant partisan trends. 90% of democrats will most likely vote democrat regardless of policy and 90% of republicans will vote republican regardless. Independents seem to lean about 50/50. This all relates to my point that the reason for the government shutdown is steadfast partisanship.

Fortunately they finally decided to reopen the government before the US defaulted.
DAMN.
The government will only be open for a few months. The default can still happen. They are still doing small comprising that won't work all the time!
Team Sad
The debt ceiling will probably go up again before a default happens. Just kicking the can down the road... Putting it off till another day...
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]