>Millions of innocent people were killed for money and power.
Of course, if accused of this, US political leaders would say something along the lines of how they were making a preemptive strike against a potentially destructive country that could have taken even more lives in the future if it had not been beaten into submission by our patriotic soldiers.
Of course, if accused of this, US political leaders would say something along the lines of how they were making a preemptive strike against a potentially destructive country that could have taken even more lives in the future if it had not been beaten into submission by our patriotic soldiers.
How to complain in style: GG, Mahulk.
Originally Posted by Ragdollmaster
>Millions of innocent people were killed for money and power.
Of course, if accused of this, US political leaders would say something along the lines of how they were making a preemptive strike against a potentially destructive country that could have taken even more lives in the future if it had not been beaten into submission by our patriotic soldiers.
What your saying is making me wonder, will the Iraq war ever end soon? I think not cause our government is so greedy they'd risk something as precious as 1 million lives.
CRASH3R - Perfectly imperfect. [UFC] It's a long road to glory.
It's more complicated than that. The US government is not one writhing mass following the same game plan, it's more like thousands of leaders, both minor and major, following their own agendas in the background while seeming united on very important things to the country.
How to complain in style: GG, Mahulk.
Again, that doesn't apply to all scenarios of war :P There isn't a single rule or set of rules that you can use for every act of war. Some situations are definite and tangible while others aren't so clear.
How to complain in style: GG, Mahulk.
