omg close ur eys pls
instead of having to manually put items into a set, they would stack automatically.
When the items go into your inventory, it would say "chronos grip X 20" or whatever. Even if you transfer the items, the item transfer would say "transfer x of 20". In a little box, all you would have to do would put a number in for the value of X. No big deal, no need for viewing each individually.
I want you to take a quick look at my inventory and i'll show a final concept which puts what everyone has said into account.
FINAL CONCEPT
with stackable items, you would still have to view an unstackable version of the items
I closed it the first time, idk who did it the second time.was informed i indeed closed it twice. too bad i don't pay attention to what im closing half of the time,thought i was closing the other thread I closed x2. I still stick with my statement below tho.
I saw the points you've made and left it alone.
Instead of assuming I've done something, look into it more. kthanks
ALso, I dont need to know why this Needs to be implemented.
with stackable items, you would still have to view an unstackable version of the items
It's the same with sets, put the items in a set, name the set what items are in the set, if you want to view the items in the set, you'll still get the long ass list of items.
FINAL CONCEPT
Saw your final concept.
I guess it could serve to be useful instead of sets.
Not sure how the coding would work, however.
Sorry to judge your idea too quickly, bad habit I need to get rid of.
Thanks for proving me wrong o7
Also, supported. Would save a lot of time and effort as well as making deactivated inventories everywhere a more organized place.
The main issue I see with this is that every single item is technically unique in terms of having its own searchable transaction history. I dont know if that would make this impossible, but if not then this idea would be great.