Steam
Toribash media
Organizations' involvement with events
Staff evaluation surveys/threads
The duelers' board
Middlemen initiative
Rules board
Anonymous peer evaluations is pretty hard to ensure, especially at the highest tiers. It'd definitely be interesting, but it's not so simple to implement.
I'd agree that staff accountability is also important, but there's only so much accountability that can be afforded to the community as a whole. There are plenty of perfectly successful communities where it's impossible to identify the moderator involved in your case, and this doesn't really cause a problem. I'd say that staff accountability for Toribash should be much more about being able to know why you were warned, infracted, or banned, and to be able to receive appropriate amounts of attention in Ban Appeals. I don't expect everyone to agree with me that that should be the primary focus though.
Now, as for whether or not the community approves of how the staff is dealing with things, that's not really accountability, but it's definitely important. It's a little bit tricky to implement appropriately, but Powas, if you already have ideas on how to do those polls, feel free to let me know about them and we can talk about what to do with them.
Some steam players stick to steam and don't really interact with forums and its crowd
A group of people that could utilize all ways of communicating with the community - interesting articles/blog posts, anecdotes, interviews, sneak peaks for events/items, podcasts, featured videos, featured art, commentary on certain (big) events like CL etc. A group that you wouldn't need to apply to, to get your piece of work featured - more of a platform for interesting stuff. There is so much more that could be getting featured on facebook page...
You also have to understand that many gamers don't "care" about forums unless they need something specific from it.