It works off the basis that people are more likely to be motivated by fear of punishment rather than a potential reward.
example: You're more likely to help someone who fell down if there was the threat of getting shot if you didn't rather than helping them because it's the "right" thing to do.
More examples: Tell someone to kiss their best friend, if they don't, you shoot their dog.
♥♥♥♥♥♥♥((((/\/\WOLFE ORKO/\/\))))♥♥♥♥♥♥♥
Actually, I'm glad you brought that up Kuna.
While it does sound similar, it can't be treated the same. There is no moral attachment to kissing someone, where helping someone up can be considered a "moral action".
While it does sound similar, it can't be treated the same. There is no moral attachment to kissing someone, where helping someone up can be considered a "moral action".
Rape? Well, in my moral compass, rape is towards the evil part. I think it's bad, to sexually assault someone like that. I'm just going to assume most people think that way as well, except for rapists.
♥♥♥♥♥♥♥((((/\/\WOLFE ORKO/\/\))))♥♥♥♥♥♥♥
Rape is bad m'kay?
More seriously, while you are free to do whatever you want with your own body, you are not allowed to extend that freedom to other people's bodies.
"The harm principle holds that the actions of individuals should only be limited to prevent harm to other individuals."
I go by that (for the most part, there are exceptions).
More seriously, while you are free to do whatever you want with your own body, you are not allowed to extend that freedom to other people's bodies.
"The harm principle holds that the actions of individuals should only be limited to prevent harm to other individuals."
I go by that (for the most part, there are exceptions).
