Fascist Dictatorship.

Only way to go.

I'd rather be a republic, or we can be an aristocrat government, since there are leaders of each branch, they can serve as higher leaders. And Rayleigh (or whoever is in charge of the org) is the renowned, ruling leader.

^
I agree with this.
Democracy always works best.

I dont think we have enough people for an effective democracy

This is like what we were running when we had the council.

It could still work if some checks and balances were worked out. As well as some sort of election process.

Have the council vote on the various issues like recruitment and whatnot. The leader can then 'veto' the decision of the council. Council re-votes and must have an overwhelming majority to overturn the leaders veto.

The leader appoints the council. One term for a leader would be 2 months and may run for reelection as many times as they wish. Anyone can be in the running for leader.

Feel free to add to it. Just a rough idea.

It's been ages discussing this. Shouldn't we decide on something already?

here's what I think.

There should be a group of people who make the orgs decisions=(Council) and decide on council applicants and have access to the sub forum but the leader has the right to fire anyone who he feels is not doing their job in the council and intervene if the council is arguing. So the leader is allowed to fire people in the org and council but not allowed to accept people into the council, that is up to the council.
here are some rules to simplify.

Council makes most/all decisions.
Council decides on council applicants/people who want to be in the council.
Leader has ability to fire anyone in the org.
Leader is not allowed to interfear with new council applicants.

New rules maybe added.

Agreed with Devil1337.
Again, I do believe an Aristocratic Government would suffice (seeing as though Silco, whoever is in charge with the navy, and whoever is in charge with the Airforce suffice as smaller leaders to Rayleigh).

How about this.


1.The council has 50% of the power in the org. The other 50% is to the leader. Meaning that the council and leader are needed for decisions as to prevent power abuse from either of them.

2.The leader can only fire a member ( be it from the council or a regular one) if 60% of the council members agree to it, in order to prevent personal conflicts to affect official decisions.

3.Events and suggestions are taken in consideration if they receive at least +3 yes votes over no votes. After that events/suggestions are brought to the council first. If they decide they are good, they will take it up with the leader.

4.Everybody CAN vote on the new applications. It's only up to the council to make the final decision ( if a member is accepted or not).

5.A personal conflict in a branch is only brought up to a superior member, preferably the branch commander. Only he can bring it up to the council if he considers it worthy, otherwise he will attempt to resolve it himself.

If there is a conflict between members of different branches, just bring it up to one of their commanders.

6. If at least 5 members want another member removed, they can bring it up to the council. Otherwise, it will be considered a personal conflict ( see point 5 ).

7. The council and leader can appoint a small event team, in charge with organizing forum and ingame events of any kind. This way it we can become more popular and it will attract even more members and make the whole org more fun to be in for everybody.

8. The council and leader are the only ones who can give infractions in the org, and have moderator abilities on the forum. Upon reaching a specific amount of infractions points, the user is banned from the org for a week. Upon 3 bans, the user is permanently banned from the org.

I like Devil's idea. This should be taken in as our form of organization and a good council.