No, I mean say someone beat War_Hero's fastest speed record by moving a few joints, and no one could get it faster, would that count as a new record? According to War_Hero it wouldn't because it would be an edit, but technically it should because it would beat the previous record even if it was an edit on the original replay.
[19:39] <Birdflu> I'm just sad that I can't give myself one
[19:39] <Birdflu> I'd have a great time
[19:39] <Birdflu> I'd have a great time
I guess that's the flaw of ego: We don't want people stealing your replays, or ideas, but somehow, purely rational it would be logical to allow edits. If it's better and it's on your name it should be your record. But I don't know. I think we shouldn't allow edits, the record book is for honour, and some noob getting away with your great setup after changing one joint is harsh.
Thanks for the Avatar, MrAakash
Death awaits me...
Originally Posted by Meamme0
I guess that's the flaw of ego: We don't want people stealing your replays, or ideas, but somehow, purely rational it would be logical to allow edits. If it's better and it's on your name it should be your record. But I don't know. I think we shouldn't allow edits, the record book is for honour, and some noob getting away with your great setup after changing one joint is harsh.
Yea this is pretty much the reason. If someone made a small edit to my hard work, and got the record instead of me, I'd be pissed.
Also, Tamer0 is winning at backflips with 5.
Last edited by War_Hero; Nov 11, 2009 at 05:37 AM.
i have a totally post modern tattoo of a scalene triangle.
<DeadorK> fair maiden<DeadorK> if the cum is going to be in your mouth
<DeadorK> it shall be in mine as well
um... wait....what would you rule if; tamer0 had his replay edited, than he made a replay based on the edit of his replay? because even if he is taking the other guys edit, it was originally his replay...or would it be void all together?
Technical Old School. - It exists.
