Originally Posted by papes
was list wrong though
Of course not. The usage of LLM technology to assist with a post--while certainly questionable, and is not something indicative of a fine interlocutor--does not undermine the points made within such a post. Those familiar with logical fallacies would recognize what transpired to be an "ad hominem" fallacy. In fact, I would argue that making use of such a fallacy renders one a worse interlocutor than one who uses LLMs to assist with internet discourse, as the latter will usually aim to stay on topic and address the arguments themselves, whereas the former doesn't.
Much to think about.
Last edited by TheLogician; Oct 29, 2025 at 04:06 AM.
My theory satisfies me;
I can see no flaw in it.
As if the main issue was him using GPT or not.
I couldn't care less if List used GPT to reformat his message in a more professional way. What was annoying is him responding to something completely unrelated to my message. He also made false claims about me saying that there are currently staff who are transphobic, somehow linked my case to Kros' one, and said a shit ton of nothing. I NEVER CLAIMED ANY STAFF MEMBER WAS TRANSPHOBIC. I said many staff support my case, agree that NONE of the actions I had done were transphobic in any way, and agree that Erth was biased af for kicking me from the discord server when I was trying to disengage in a conversation with toffee, whose whole life purpose is to get people they dislike banned.
Stop focusing on sounding professional, this isn't the court of law and I couldn't care less if you respond with a 10 page essay in perfect grammar. Instead, maybe spend more than half a minute reading my message, understand what I said, and respond to me accordingly.
I couldn't care less if List used GPT to reformat his message in a more professional way. What was annoying is him responding to something completely unrelated to my message. He also made false claims about me saying that there are currently staff who are transphobic, somehow linked my case to Kros' one, and said a shit ton of nothing. I NEVER CLAIMED ANY STAFF MEMBER WAS TRANSPHOBIC. I said many staff support my case, agree that NONE of the actions I had done were transphobic in any way, and agree that Erth was biased af for kicking me from the discord server when I was trying to disengage in a conversation with toffee, whose whole life purpose is to get people they dislike banned.
Stop focusing on sounding professional, this isn't the court of law and I couldn't care less if you respond with a 10 page essay in perfect grammar. Instead, maybe spend more than half a minute reading my message, understand what I said, and respond to me accordingly.
If I was able to have one wish, it would be to live closer to my one true love Fred, his beard tastes so nice.
He is also a far superior tk player.
LegGang
Originally Posted by Fire
As if the main issue was him using GPT or not.
I couldn't care less if List used GPT to reformat his message in a more professional way. What was annoying is him responding to something completely unrelated to my message. He also made false claims about me saying that there are currently staff who are transphobic, somehow linked my case to Kros' one, and said a shit ton of nothing. I NEVER CLAIMED ANY STAFF MEMBER WAS TRANSPHOBIC. I said many staff support my case, agree that NONE of the actions I had done were transphobic in any way, and agree that Erth was biased af for kicking me from the discord server when I was trying to disengage in a conversation with toffee, whose whole life purpose is to get people they dislike banned.
Stop focusing on sounding professional, this isn't the court of law and I couldn't care less if you respond with a 10 page essay in perfect grammar. Instead, maybe spend more than half a minute reading my message, understand what I said, and respond to me accordingly.
lol your legacy is ruined
