Originally Posted by
teague19
how about the concept of a ruler? religion created that all (god). w/o the idea of a ruler we would be trying to rule each other, im not saying this is 100% i just wanna hear ur thoughts on that.
It's common in nature. Lions, wolves, dogs, all have alpha-males. Those Alpha's are the ruler. There is no religion in the animal kingdom, and they have rulers.
Humans are no different, there was a time with no religion and there was the Alpha-male of the tribe, or the "Chief" who ran things.
Originally Posted by
ThatHurt
I hadn't thought of that o.o putting it that way without religion no government would exist beat that Aikido
Done. =P Extending the Alpha-male thing to a broader population, the Alpha would branch out as well, moving from a dictatorship to having those around him who he trusts and would help him run things, this moves into another form of dictatorship, but eventually into a crude working of democracy as the peoples favorite would be more likely to challenge the current Alpha-male, seeing as the others would help him do it.
Basic beginnings of government.
Originally Posted by
ThatHurt
my religion believes in freedom of religion o.o (in other words even if your another religion we don't look down on you, but believe in the end we all go to heaven if your a good person.) Although I will never tell somebody else there religion is wrong or mine is right, I have no proof and there faith is just as strong as mine, we wont know til we're dead =P
I do like the idea of that, but I have to ask, what if someone is a non-believer? Would they still be allowed through the "pearly gates"?
--------------------------------------------------
Honestly, to me, religion just seems to be a quick and easy answer to the unexplained.
Dig deeper into what you want to know and you'll find there is less and less need for religion, or god, for explanations of the world around us.
Now, I have nothing against personal religion, if people go to it for comfort, but I view that as a completely different thing than widespread religious workings. If it stayed as a personal choice, there would be no diversity among religions, no bad thoughts towards those of another religion simply because it would all be considered a passing thought, it wouldn't be religion at all, only a belief.
When I say no diversity, I mean it in this way; When religion (or worshiping) first came about, there was no "God" or "Allah" or whatever other name you want to call it, it was simply a higher power that people looked to when they had no explanation of the events they were going through. From that it expanded into the idolization of other *seemingly* unexplainable phenomenon, such as - the sun, the moon, ocean/waves, the earth, volcanoes, etc - but as each of these things were explained and were understood, people stopped worshiping them. You then have a "void" of idols, where the society is conditioned to accept the system of sacrificing/worshiping things, they fill that space with something else and a new religion is born.
Now take "God" or "Allah", and it's genius really, something outside space and time, completely unexplainable, cannot be understood in any sense, it can never be replaced because of a deeper understanding, and will persist through other changes. Keeps the religion alive.
Anyways, these are my half-asleep semi-rants of the night, I'm sorry if I strayed from the path of the discussion, but as I am about to fall asleep, my mind tends to follow whatever path it likes.
I'm probably going to wake up tomorrow, read this over, and offer a huge "WTF?!" to myself for it, but oh well, here it goes.
Last edited by AikidoKP; Feb 17, 2011 at 11:02 AM.