Dont know if this has been suggested before this but here it is. I think you should make changes in TB suck that only one client (or whatever its called) can be opened at a time. I have seen this on many games. Dont know how hard it is but it would surely help!

it is actually allowed to play on several servers at one time.
but its not allowed to play on one server 2+ times.

also not supported, beacuse i dont think that this affects farming much.

No, what happens if you have a brother/sister that also plays? That's how I started, my brother got me into it. Without the ability to do that a lot of people wouldn't be able to play.

This would require farmers to have 2 computers, so it would heavily decrease farming.
Question is, are we willing to give up multitasking and playing with family to prevent farming?

I'm not sure how this would help, as previously stated it's allowed for you to play in two different servers, and now-a-days it's allowed for you to play in with yourself/same ip (like a brother sister mother father whatever) in a private server. With a booster if you're playing with the same IP then you don't get any tc (I'm an ex-gm and I asked a current gm to make sure that this is true.) I'd also like to mention that with the same IP, two users playing against each other won't get qi either. Your suggestion isn't as effective as you think it'd be.

So honestly, farming already pretty much requires two computers if you'd like to do it easily. In reality this really wouldn't cut as much down on farming as you'd think it would.

I don't like this idea. What, you want me to abandom my current game or my own room just to join and wait in GM tourney?


You fools :P This is already applied. If you bash your other client, no TCs or qi are awarded. So farmers basically already need two computers, if they plan to farm alone.

what if... the farmer is rich?

Then they can just buy TC?

Forgive my last post, i knew that playing with your own account doesn't award you with tc/qi, i didn't know it was based on IP.

But apparently a solution already exists, so i'm gonna go ahead and close this.