In defence of Itemp
On the 13th of August Itemp was sent an extra 135$ from his USD duels with Deoxer. Before this event, Deoxer sent the wrong amount once again to Itemp, this time less than agreed upon. It is clear Deoxer has little understanding of how the basics of PayPal works and needed to gain a basic understanding before duelling his USD. What Itemp did isn't something any other Human is incapable of doing and it is nothing new therefore Staff did not close the thread made by Deoxer because they are trying to protect Itemp or favourite him. They closed that thread because it was laid out like a scam report. There was not a scam and off-topic is scam-reports.
This community does not tolerate 'theft' and we have Staff members who do everything in their power to punish or fix any issues on it. I may sound insensitive however I believe you think fighting for Deoxer is the right thing to do and is helping the community/staff on this situation however it does nothing at all to the situation and is instead counterproductive. I suggest you bring forth proper points and arguments instead of creating an open questionnaire, which serves no support to the staff members investigating.
If you are interested in wasting your time reading the answers to all of Diamond's questions I will add a spoiler, enjoy.
- Why does our community tolerate theft, when everywhere in the world it is considered a crime?
'theft' being the action or crime of stealing. Display evidence of Itemp forcefully taking Deoxer's money. Our community doesn't tolerate theft at all. If it did we wouldn't have people volunteering to be MS so they can protect the community from scams, stolen art ect.
- Do you agree that thieves’ actions should not be exposed, because it may bring hate upon them?
Staff wouldn't publicly expose someone regarding their offence or the investigation. If staff always "exposed the actions of thieves" how would this aid their investigation. Itemp being considered as a thief is ridicolous. Itemp has stolen nothing from Deoxer and it was deoxers responsibility to send the correct ammount. Additionally, you seem to give praise to Deoxer for even sending to begin with as it was the right choice... He was expected to send Itemp it isn't anything suprising that he sent.
- Do you agree that thieves' actions should not be discussed, because it may be offensive to them?
Is this some sort of joke? What differs from this question and the other question?
- Do you agree that people should get banned for things like slurs and toxicity(not to bring up my experiences, where I was getting banned on suspicion of striking a fair deal) but not for blatant theft?
Staff are actively dealing with the situation and you are yet to provide evidence of a Toribash User stealing TC from another user and going unpunished. Staff ban people for all of those things for a reason and if they choose to keep Itemp unpunished because of the forums rules then so be it. Are you trying to make staff create new rules just for the sake of banning itemp? wouldn't that go against everything you embody and protest against the staff for?
Moving on, I would like to bring forward to the discussion the fact that Deoxer said to Itemp that he did not care for the extra USD he sent. I'm sure how you can see this is problematic right? Deoxer creates a thread stating he wants his money back! Meanwhile, Itemp has been told that the extra money sent by Deoxer is a whatever... In Deoxer's defence, he may have been suffering from some sort of In real-life problems clouding his judgement. We are all human, granted we all make mistakes sometimes and from these mistakes, we learn valuable lessons. Regardless of deoxer's state of well-being, Itemp has every right to take what has been given to him and did so. It is very naive to believe that Itemp had to send back the money. It was optional and Itemp made a decision. If Deoxer doesn't understand how it feels to be punished for making a mistake then, Welcome to the party. Deoxer can either walk off this set-back or keep dwelling on it, his choice. Additionally, you used in your attack on Itemp a definition of what you believe 'constitutes theft'. Wikipedia is in no way a reliable source of information as it's information can be altered. Therefore it's inadmissible and shouldn't even be given a read as it could just be changed to fit your attack against Itemp. If you are feeling bad for being misinformed here is a dictionary definition of theft which can even be googled.
theft - the action or crime of stealing.
Furthermore relating to real-life instances for your argument seems very hypocritical of you, as in your previous ban appeal you seemed to believe real-life laws didn't apply to the Toribash forum laws. A statement correctly said by fudgiebalz pretty much explains it all
"Would like to add how you were all "innocent until proven guilty" on your thread, but here you've just assumed iTemp to be guilty given the same level of testimony." I believe this thread is just pointless and if you would like to give unhealthy and useless criticism of staff do it in staff complaints and not here.
I also think you should commit this statement from Grohenbird to memory as I 100% believe it is true
"If you want a solution, petition staff to support USD duels and set guidelines on expected practice. Do not sit here and defend a practice that isn't supported by the official staff of the game just because it helps fit your narrative of someone you dislike being a bad person. This public witch hunt isn't going to solve anything and just makes you look petty."
Since you love time-wasting open questionnaires why don't you answer mine?
if this situation put deoxer in such a terrible financial situation, were his actions intelligent or responsible?
Everyone was given the ability to make decisions. Why should Itemp's decision to keep unwanted money be labelled a crime.?
You are 100% certain all of your clanmates including yourself have never once taken advantage of another person in this community? (even when there is concrete evidence you have)
You speak of Itemp as some sort of menace due to past experience, are you sure you would have kept this moral high ground if the roles where reversed?
You seem keen to see Itemp punished without properly understanding the situation from both perspectives, do you believe you are the best person to defend Deoxer without being biased?
In a world where all the rules of the earth applied to every single game forum, do you believe you are the cleanest player on toribash?
Proof :
Image of Deoxer showing he didn't care about the extra 135$
The transactions of past USD duels between Deoxer and Itemp before the 135$ was sent
Last edited by Shield; Aug 17, 2020 at 11:12 PM.