Originally Posted by ruby

Perma is often not permanent and can be subject to an appeal

Originally Posted by Nikorn

I guess still if you deserved a permaban, and then appealed to unban, it's still fair to lose everything you had, because starting the game after perma means a fresh start

Originally Posted by ruby

What made you come to that conclusion?

Originally Posted by Nikorn

I guess still if you deserved a permaban, and then appealed to unban, it's still fair to lose everything you had, because starting the game after perma means a fresh start

Originally Posted by Bison

A hypothetical situation based on your assumption:

- Xyz got perma ban for breaking the rules.
- Xyz's equipment was requisitioned by admins.
- Xyz wrote an appeal in which he presented unquestionable evidence of his innocence.
- Xyz is back in the game but his inventory is no longer his, now it's ours. *USSR Anthem Starts Playing*
Correct me if I misunderstood you.

Originally Posted by Bison

A hypothetical situation based on your assumption:

- Xyz got perma ban for breaking the rules.
- Xyz's equipment was requisitioned by admins.
- Xyz wrote an appeal in which he presented unquestionable evidence of his innocence.
- Xyz is back in the game but his inventory is no longer his, now it's ours. *USSR Anthem Starts Playing*
Correct me if I misunderstood you.

Originally Posted by Nikorn

I don't mean to take items the last second you ban someone, but if there is something, where you cant prove you innocence. Like in smurf's case as i said

Originally Posted by ruby

OP, think about it this way: when we lock up a criminal, we send them to prison, because that's considered punishment enough. The government doesn't then go and take all of their money and assets (unless, perhaps, they were gained illegitimately, but that's a different story). Extreme example, yeah, but even in the prison system, parole exists. Same concept: being banned is punishment enough in most cases.