Forumite
Originally Posted by Hyde
What part of her track record says that to you? The weakest part of her platform is foreign affairs, she's proven to be terrible in foreign dealings
Also, she's a war hawk in every sense of the word, would not trust her with our peace
you're basically the antithesis to everyone here huh
not that that makes you any less correct
Originally Posted by FruitCandy
At least she didn't get banned from an entire country
as I recall neither has Trump
Originally Posted by Micah
Bernie 2016
^^^^^^^^^^ this
I feel neither should be considered for president trump because of his lack of political experience and poor tone of speech if someones is going to represent the country it shouldn't be someone who is constantly mouthing off. and Hilary's slogan is "i'm with her" implying we should vote for "Her" because she's a woman which is disgusting and we need someone who can better are foreign relations i feel like neither candidates can do this effectively but i would have to say Hillary hopefully she won't pick a bad running mate unlike trump
Trying
Originally Posted by SruX
^^^^^^^^^^ this
I feel neither should be considered for president trump because of his lack of political experience and poor tone of speech if someones is going to represent the country it shouldn't be someone who is constantly mouthing off. and Hilary's slogan is "i'm with her" implying we should vote for "Her" because she's a woman which is disgusting and we need someone who can better are foreign relations i feel like neither candidates can do this effectively but i would have to say Hillary hopefully she won't pick a bad running mate unlike trump
So the obvious choice is the left wing nutter? Not saying Bernie wouldn't be a good president, he's a good man and cares about his constituents and there aren't very many politicians like that, but c'mon. We're at a point where we've economically ruined the future of the millennial generation and we should be going into damage control mode instead of continuing to destroy the future of our youth for our own sake.
We really don't need any more crippling debt on top of that. We desperately need a fundamental libertarian in government, bring the spending down to size. We don't need a military 5x as big as the next biggest, we have enough nukes to guarantee no one fucks with us on a large scale. We do not need the worlds biggest military for the small scale conflicts we are likely to see in the near future.
Depending how Turkey turns out in the next decade, I could very well be completely wrong on that last part, but we'll see.
Hoss.
Turkey is what you are worried about? Just because it made the move from nominally secular to openly Islamic doesn't mean they are going to nuke the west.
Islamic nations can function without causing significant problems. Sure they aren't the same as the west in regards to civil liberties, human rights, etc, but they can exist. I would not be worried about Turkey.
In terms of war, the most likely instigator is the US, they are constantly posturing against China, and Russia. Neither of them seem likely to want to fight, but if you want to be worried about something, maybe be worried about China?
(Especially if Hillary wins, she certainly is willing and able to create wars for profit)
Islamic nations can function without causing significant problems. Sure they aren't the same as the west in regards to civil liberties, human rights, etc, but they can exist. I would not be worried about Turkey.
In terms of war, the most likely instigator is the US, they are constantly posturing against China, and Russia. Neither of them seem likely to want to fight, but if you want to be worried about something, maybe be worried about China?
(Especially if Hillary wins, she certainly is willing and able to create wars for profit)
