Ranking
Originally Posted by phish View Post
it's mainly behavior and attitude for me, rules i dont care about.
i can list off a couple staff members i think are shit because of how they act both on and off forums.

Icky. From what I've seen he acts like a complete child with peoples ban appeals, I don't have any screenshots to provide but I think any post he has made in ban appeals would suffice.
This post in particular on forums in a non-moderation way is also childish, sure its enclave and "haha everyone and staff can shit on enclave because " but the "you're an idiot" is not necessary.
This is the only one I've come across because I don't have the patience to scroll through his post history.
At least this bad screenshot isn't from a year ago and without proper context




Chick. He's incompetent, gives the wrong advice, hardly does the job the staff position requires, and he's immature. Just check his messages in #support

chick


the evidence you provided for chick is wholly unconvincing to me, just looks like he got ninja'd in the first one and affirmed with authority the response of a fellow community memberin the second. i'm not sure what the role of a toriagent is, are they supposed to check in on the beginner sanctuary often?

as for icky, see below.

Originally Posted by Ele View Post
Don't you find his post edits hilarious though? Like when he edits someone's shitpost to say something like "Nice try, see me after class", hahaha. Don't you LOL and find that to be the funniest thing ever? He's a funny guy!

I remember seeing that post of his about Enclave around the time he made it and it definitely made me think 'Fuck you dickhead' - What kind of cunt calls someone an idiot for trying to help out? "It's a placeholder for the new event", that's all he had to say. Icky though, being a spiteful dickhead, saw the opportunity to insult Enclave and took it. Let me tell you something about our boy Icky, when it comes to holding grudges, he's worse than an elephant. Really is like a little child.
----
ed's a good guy tho, don't think he's put a step wrong that I recall

i personally don't see enclave doing anything out of the goodness of his own heart.
i thought he took it as a chance to gloat to staff "i see what you're doing in your back rooms, you're not getting past me".
i have some vague recollection of a wibbles controversy that enclave was a part of around the time of this post, so maybe it was excess frustration that icky tried to use to make enclave feel silly. i could be wrong though, so take this with a grain of salt.

i do remember thinking 'oh snap' when reading it for the first time, and maybe that's not the kind of reaction you want for a post from a staff member
then again, i'm not opposed to seeing someone who i think is a smug bastard get their ego brought down a few pegs

Originally Posted by phish View Post
this is also something i have a problem with, imagine having the power to close threads or edit them to be less of a problem, instead you edit the post and make yourself look like an ass while doing it.
im pretty sure icky wasnt the only one, i remember chirs doing it a bit in wibbles

to prevent this post from being exclusively a "shit on icky" post, i'll add something else
If you are a moderator, capable of closing or editing threads and deleting posts or threads, what is the purpose of editing a post to try to be funny?
this is a serious question to icky or whoever else has done this.
i get maybe trying to lighten up the thread or whatever but if its blatantly not funny why even save the edit.

edit: i think higher staff should take a closer and unbiased look at current staff members including ninjas and look at what they have said or how they have acted towards any member regardless of personal issues or beliefs, and finding any problematic or bad things a staff member has said shortly prior to or after becoming their position should be brought up and asked about.
if staff wants to get rid of bad members, they should get rid of bad staff also
for an example, if icky were help squad member and i were his lead and i saw that he had called a member an idiot publicly or privately(privately being in hidden threads or subforums like ban appeals), id be talking to him about it and expressing that he shouldnt conduct himself like that regardless of history he has with a particular person. Basically be unbiased to everyone and remain helpful.

idk if what i said makes sense, im sick and have to take a massive diarrhea shit now

i don't really get this point, humour is subjective and icky/chirs probably like the edits they make.
i don't think i've seen a whole lot of icky's edits, but chirs's edits were always humourous to me.

correct me if i'm wrong but icky doesn't have a lot of people to answer to, right?
are you proposing that sir/hampa/suo/skul take a look at icky's actions?

let that river run wild in you until the waters are calm again
alright guy